>And I found the problem with the GUI.  I was entering .001, not 0.001. 
THe
>gui apparently needs that leading zero.

This will be fixed.

Your '0.1' guess was good (for me). While reviewing the code and checking 
the math, because I fiirst assumed your guess was well educated, I found a 
really nice debugging line, which caused assp to skip reading the corpus 
confidence at startup. This caused assp to use a too low corpus confidence 
from the startup to the first rebuildspamdb or the first reported mail.
This will be also fixed.

Thomas




Von:    K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com>
An:     ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>
Datum:  11.05.2015 15:43
Betreff:        Re: [Assp-test] baysConf invalid / and explanation please



I guess I >>REALLY<< don't understand the math and I will heed to your
advice and use 0.001 as a starting point.  At some point I'll study up to
better understand why that's a good idea.  Thanks

And I found the problem with the GUI.  I was entering .001, not 0.001. THe
gui apparently needs that leading zero.

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Thomas Eckardt 
<thomas.ecka...@thockar.com>
wrote:

> >Is there a practical difference between 0 and 0.001
>
> Yes - from the mathematical point of view a practical 'baysConf' range 
is
> between 0.000001 and 1
>
> >I'd think something like 0.1 would be a good starting point
>
> thought ? - calculated ? - this is a very very wild guess - with an 
ideal
> corpus norm of 1.00 a value of 0.1 for baysConf will lead in to over 90%
> low confidence detection
> The math (shown in the GUI) explains how the confidence value is
> calculated.
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
> Von:    K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com>
> An:     ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Datum:  11.05.2015 04:28
> Betreff:        [Assp-test] baysConf invalid / and explanation please
>
>
>
> I'm starting to explore the possibilty of changing baysConf away from 0.
>
> First, I might have found a bug: I entered .001 to see what would 
happen,
> and also tried .005 but I get a javascript popup for both saying:
>
>      Invalid 'baysConf' - unchanged
>
>
> I've read the gui description, but I'm confused as to why .001 would be 
a
> good starting point.  Is there a practical difference between 0 and 
0.001
> I'd think something like 0.1 would be a good starting point, only 10%
> certain vs .001 which would be 0.1% confident if I understand correctly.
>
> 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
> Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
> Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
> Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>
>
>
>
>
>
> DISCLAIMER:
> *******************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, 
legally
> privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of 
the
>
> individual to whom it is addressed.
> This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
> known virus in this email!
> *******************************************************
>
>
> 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
> Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
> Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
> Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test






DISCLAIMER:
*******************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally 
privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the 

individual to whom it is addressed.
This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no 
known virus in this email!
*******************************************************

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

Reply via email to