Terminology mixed me up I guess. Was thinking as the "domain name" as what's registered with the registrar. What's being checked, I'd call the "hostname" <-- but I'm wrong according to the RFC. Sorry for that.
I know that submail.navy.mil isn't valid, but navy.mil certainly is. Shouldn't ASSP find that though and not complain stating that no more DNS checking will be done? And I don't understand what the problem is with co.delaware.pa.us and the other co.county.state.us domains. They're valid domain/host names with mx records. And it's only multiple part hostnames that show up as warnings in the logs as far as I can tell. Not really worried, just thought I'd bring it up to insure something wonky isn't going on. Thanks On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Thomas Eckardt <thomas.ecka...@thockar.com> wrote: > RFC5321 section 2.3.5. Domain Names > > ASSP is smart and ask for 'ANY' DNS registration for the domainpart of the > sender address - no entry -> no luck! > > disable 'DoRFC822' if this is not working for you > > Thomas > > > > > > Von: K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> > An: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> > Datum: 05.04.2016 17:01 > Betreff: Re: [Assp-test] can't find a name server registration > > > > This problem hasn't gone away and it only seems to be with hostnames that > have more than 2 parts - > > For example: > co.delaware.pa.us > resolves just fine on the dns servers > co.delaware.pa.us MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = > co-delaware-pa-us.mail.protection.outlook.com > > co-delaware-pa-us.mail.protection.outlook.com internet address = > 207.46.163.247 > co-delaware-pa-us.mail.protection.outlook.com internet address = > 207.46.163.215 > co-delaware-pa-us.mail.protection.outlook.com internet address = > 207.46.163.138 > > And > submail.navy.mil > *which doesn't seem to be a valid hostname, but shouldn't ASSP be looking > for a name server registration for navy.mil <http://navy.mil> and not the > full hostname? *I don't know, I'm asking. Just seems odd that the only > time I get these warnings are for hostnames with more than just 2 parts. > > Thanks > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 12:44 PM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Seeing this again. This time: > > Warning: can't find a name server registration for the sender domain ' > > co.dodge.wi.us' - all DNS queries will be skipped! > > > > It seems that 99% of the time it's a long city / county domain name like > > co.dodge.wi.us ci.wilsonville.or.us co.geauga.oh.us and > co.delaware.pa.us > > > > Thomas, any ideas? > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:47 PM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> At least it's not just me. > >> > >> James - FYI, you definitely don't want to use public DNS servers for > ASSP > >> - too slow and more importantly you could have trouble with things like > >> DNSBL, senderbase, etc where it's limited to a certain number of > queries > >> per IP. > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:36 PM, James Moe <ji...@sohnen-moe.com> wrote: > >> > >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >>> Hash: SHA1 > >>> > >>> On 01/29/2016 11:10 AM, K Post wrote: > >>> > I see this on occasion: > >>> > > >>> ASSP version 2.4.5(15334) > >>> I have the same problem. > >>> > >>> > >>> 2016-02-01 08:32:24 Warning: Name Server 205.171.3.65: does not > >>> respond or timed out > >>> 2016-02-01 08:32:24 Warning: Name Server 8.8.8.8: does not respond or > >>> timed out > >>> 2016-02-01 08:33:24 Warning: Name Server 127.0.0.1: does not respond > >>> or timed out > >>> 2016-02-01 08:33:24 Warning: Name Server 205.171.3.65: does not > >>> respond or timed out > >>> 2016-02-01 08:33:24 Warning: Name Server 8.8.8.8: does not respond or > >>> timed out > >>> 2016-02-01 09:32:49 Warning: Name Server 205.171.3.65: does not > >>> respond or timed out > >>> 2016-02-01 11:15:27 Warning: can't find a name server registration for > >>> the sender domain 'mktg.actonsoftware.com' - all DNS queries will be > >>> skipped! > >>> > >>> > >>> - -- > >>> James Moe > >>> moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com > >>> 520.743.3936 > >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > >>> Version: GnuPG v2 > >>> > >>> iEYEARECAAYFAlavs8cACgkQzTcr8Prq0ZMSPwCffuGpMYSd1e7/mqCD6AitMYbu > >>> Jm8AnRxQrpenZVUHTwunXFg0E8HvMWYx > >>> =e+8I > >>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >>> > >>> > >>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance > >>> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month > >>> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now > >>> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! > >>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Assp-test mailing list > >>> Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net > >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test > >>> > >> > >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Assp-test mailing list > Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test > > > > > DISCLAIMER: > ******************************************************* > This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally > privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the > > individual to whom it is addressed. > This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no > known virus in this email! > ******************************************************* > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Assp-test mailing list > Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
