I looked at the code for the updated plugin, if I'm understanding it
correctly, you use exe-bin and then specify exceptions using :type (colon
and type)   You'd never use on of the exceptions by themselves.  If that's
correct, when you're ready for another update, I'd change the description.

 If \'exe-bin\' is defined, the Plugin will detect executable files based
on their binary content. All executables, libraries, and scripts for DOS
and Windows (except .com files), MS office macros(VBA), MAC-OS and linux
ELF (for all processor architectures) will be detected.<br /><br />
If you want to skip the detection for a specific executable type, specify
exe-bin (which detects all executables) and then add exceptions to exclude
specific types:Example:  \'exe-bin|::MSOM|:WSH\' - notice the leading
collon for the exceptions!  This example will block all detected executable
files except for MS Office Macro files (:MSOM) and Windows Shell Scripts
(:WSH)<br /><br />


On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:34 PM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is simply TERRIFIC.  Thank you.  I hope to test this weekend.
>
> Can you clarify syntax a little for me?
>
> If I want to block  .abc and .xyz extensions plus all exe-bin detected
> EXCEPT for MSOM for a person - both IN AND OUT, and allow everything else
> in or out, what would their userattach line look like?
>
> A couple months ago, you added clarification that BLOCK directives in user
> attach trump ALLOW, so I don't know how to block any exe-bin except for the
> one type.
>
> ouru...@ourcharity.org => block => abc|xyz|exe-bin => allow => *|:MSOM
> doesn't seem right.
>
> Do I need to not use exe-bin and instead specify all other exe types?
> ouru...@ourcharity.org => block => abc|xyz|:WIN|:MOS|:PEF|:ELF|:WSH|:MMC|
> :ARC|:CSC
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Thomas Eckardt <
> thomas.ecka...@thockar.com> wrote:
>
>> 1) - I've just released some new code (ASSP_AFC.pm 4.38) at CVS, which
>> allows skipping the executable detection for some types. It is not fully
>> tested!
>>
>> ......
>> If you've installed the ASSP_AFC Plugin (at least version 2.10) and
>> 'exe-bin' is defined (on any level), the Plugin will detect executable
>> files based on there binary content. Detected will be all executables,
>> libraries and scripts for DOS and Windows (except .com files), MS office
>> macros(VBA), MAC-OS and linux ELF (for all processor architectures).
>> If you want to skip the detection for a specific executable type, define
>> any combination of the tags below like: 'exe-bin|:WSH|:MSOM|:WIN' - notice
>> the leading collon for the exceptions!
>>
>>  :WIN - windows executables
>>  :MOS - Mach-O executables
>>  :PEF - Classic MacOS executables
>>  :ELF - ELF (linux) executables
>>  :WSH - windows shell scripts
>>  :MMC - windows MMC Console Files
>>  :ARC - static library (linux,unix)
>>  :CSC - common scripts (basic,java,perl,php,powershell....)
>>  :MSOM - microsoft office macros
>>
>>
>> 2) The reason is shown in the attachted .txt file. The text can be defined
>> in the ASSP_AFC plugin. Two new literals are available
>> REASON - for the attachment
>> VIRUS - for the virus check
>>
>> ......
>> The text which replaces the bad attachment. The litteral FILENAME will be
>> replaced with the name of the bad attachment! The litteral REASON will be
>> replaced with the reason, because the attachment was rejected!
>>
>> ......
>> The text which replaces the bad mailparts that contains a virus. The
>> litteral FILENAME will be replaced with the name of a bad attachment! The
>> litteral VIRUS will be replaced with the name of the virus!
>>
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Von:    K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com>
>> An:     ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> Datum:  01.09.2016 17:18
>> Betreff:        Re: [Assp-test] Urgent: AFC plugin,     ALLOW MS Office
>> Macro from some users
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Hmmm ... what, if the senders PC is infected by a zero day macro virus?
>>
>>
>> You're preaching to the choir on this.  I'm in complete agreement, we
>> shouldn't allow MS Office Macro files, but there's no choice . The powers
>> that be are insisting on it, and for a critical reason.  There's a VERY
>> large company that sends word macro files.  They'll only send them via
>> email, they won't change what they do, and this user relies on these files
>> for the charity.  Stinks.  Management is insistent that we permit them to
>> this user.  Of course, the user is about as low tech as they get.  i have
>> a
>> feeling he'll click / open anything.  This whole situation drives me
>> crazy,
>> but it's the situation nonetheless.
>>
>> I saw in the AFC plugin where it's identifying the MS Office Macro TYPE of
>> executable.  We set the type variable and it shows in the log.
>>
>> 1) Might we be able to work that somehow into the filter?   That would let
>> AFC do its thing and detect executable content even if the extension is
>> renamed but give us a way via UserAttach to allow macros through but not
>> any other *detected* executable.
>>
>> 2) Related, could we add this type variable to the block text to show why
>> the file wasn't allowed?  I have regular users being confused by .doc
>> files
>> being rejected when they're rejected because of macros.
>>
>>
>> Thanks again
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:51 AM, Thomas Eckardt
>> <thomas.ecka...@thockar.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > >I certainly don't want to allow all exe files, just
>> > >word/excel macros.
>> > ...
>> > >Is there a way with the AFC plugin enabled to enable MS Office files
>> WITH
>> > >MACROS in them to come through from a specific domain?
>> >
>> > There is no other way. MS office macros are executables - you need to
>> > allow executables (exe-bin) for this user.
>> > But you can block attachments by file extension (exe|com|scr|js .......)
>> >
>> > >Nothing I can do.
>> > Hmmm ... what, if the senders PC is infected by a zero day macro virus?
>> > Something like a new Melissa -
>> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melissa_(computer_virus)
>> > - or a new Locky
>> >
>> >
>> > Thomas
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Von:    K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com>
>> > An:     ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> > Datum:  31.08.2016 22:09
>> > Betreff:        [Assp-test] Urgent: AFC plugin, ALLOW MS Office Macro
>> from
>> > some users
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > One of our key user regularly get MS Office files *with macros* in them
>> > from a specific domain The outside sender insists on the macro.  I can't
>> > stand this, but there is absolutely NO way to avoid this.    Another
>> case
>> > of business requirements requiring bad tech decisions.  Nothing I can
>> do.
>> >
>> > Is there a way with the AFC plugin enabled to enable MS Office files
>> WITH
>> > MACROS in them to come through from a specific domain?  Even better
>> would
>> > be to allow just that ONE user on our end to get ms office files with
>> > macros sent from this single domain.
>> >
>> > I've looked at UserAttach, but I don't know the syntax to specify a
>> office
>> > file with macro.  I certainly don't want to allow all exe files, just
>> > word/excel macros.  Awfully big problem for us.
>> >
>> > Thank you
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------
>> > ------------------
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Assp-test mailing list
>> > Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > DISCLAIMER:
>> > *******************************************************
>> > This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential,
>> legally
>> > privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of
>> the
>> >
>> > individual to whom it is addressed.
>> > This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
>> > known virus in this email!
>> > *******************************************************
>> >
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------
>> > ------------------
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Assp-test mailing list
>> > Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>> >
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> Assp-test mailing list
>> Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> DISCLAIMER:
>> *******************************************************
>> This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally
>> privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the
>>
>> individual to whom it is addressed.
>> This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
>> known virus in this email!
>> *******************************************************
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Assp-test mailing list
>> Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>>
>>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

Reply via email to