Thanks for another awesome update.

I don't know how to fix this, and I'm absolutely not asking you to, but
upon inspecting the Outlook plugin that you moved, I believe it is still is
only forwarding the message in question, vs forwarding as an attachment
(preserving the headers).  I think it's worth noting that in the readme.


On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Thomas Eckardt <thomas.ecka...@thockar.com>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> fixed in assp 2.5.4 build 16340:
>
> changed:
>
> - purr:// is now a valid protocol definition in URIBL
>
> - enhanced obfuscated IP (v4 and V6) address detection in URIBL
>   for example: 0x9A3F0800CEBF9E37 or 0xCE.191.0236.0x37
>   URIBL fails, if such an obfuscated IP is detected, even the configured
> HIT's are not reached
>
> - better error detection and maillog output, if the user address
> verification using VRFY does not work
>
> - assp bypassed several checks, if the RWL (DNSWL) check reported a medium
> trust level
>   this is now only be done, if the reported RWL trust level is the highest
> (3)
>
> - more functional implementation of lists.dnswl.org and equivalent local
> RWL providers
>
> 'RWLServiceProvider','RWL Service Providers*'
>  Host Names of RWLs to use separated by "|".
>  Examples are:
>  list.dnswl.org|query.bondedsender.org|cml.anti-spam.org.cn|iadb.isipp.com
> |hul.habeas.com
>
> If you use a local provider of the list.dnswl.org zone, your local
> provider zone name has to contain
> 'list.dnswl.org' - for example: list.dnswl.org.yourdns.local
>  because list.dnswl.org provides special return codes (127.0.X.Y)
>  where X defines the category and Y the trust value!
>
> For list.dnswl.org or any equivalent local provider, it is possible to
> override the reported trust value based
> on the reported category. To do this, use the following syntax in the
> service provider definition:
>  serviceprovider:category=>trust_value[,category_from-
> category_to=>-trust_value][,*=>+trust_value]
>  * is used, if no other match is found. Any or all categories may be
> defined for the override. If no override
>  is found for a category, the reported trust value is used.
>  + and - are math operations to the reported trust value.
>
> The currently by dnswl.org provided categories are:
>  2 = Financial services
>  3 = Email Service Providers
>  4 = Organisations
>  5 = Service/network providers
>  6 = Personal/private servers
>  7 = Travel/leisure industry
>  8 = Public sector/governments
>  9 = Media and Tech companies
>  10 = some special cases
>  11 = Education, academic
>  12 = Healthcare
>  13 = Manufacturing/Industrial
>  14 = Retail/Wholesale/Services
>  15 = Email Marketing Providers
>
>  The returned trust values by list.dnswl.org are:
>  0 = none
>  1 = low
>  2 = medium
>  3 = high
>
>  override example: list.dnswl.org:15=>0,2=>+1,5=>-2
>  For list.dnswl.org set the trust for category 15 to zero regardless the
> reported trust value, increase the trust value by one for category 2 and
> decrease the trust value for the category 5 by 2.
>
>
> Thomas
>
> PS:
> The sourceforge file download page as well as the CVS repository contains
> now a folder for assp-emailinterface mail client reporting plugins
> (currently MS-Outlook and Lotus Notes only)
> Hints, experiences, scripts and download links for these and all other
> mail clients are welcome!
> As stated in the related README.TXT files, only the Lotus Notes agent code
> is well tested and used in production by the assp developent (me)!
> If you find a BUG in the Lotus Notes agent code, please report them to me!
> If you find BUGs in the MS-Outlook related code, try to fix them - post
> the fix - BUT don't bother me!
>
>
> DISCLAIMER:
> *******************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally
> privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the
> individual to whom it is addressed.
> This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
> known virus in this email!
> *******************************************************
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

Reply via email to