>But what is being tested for "outgoing" vs "incoming and local"
Nothing is tested using these header lines - these headers are recorded
for future processing like rebuildspamdb, analyzing, resend, reports, GUI
actions ....
>2) ... I don't see a problem with this
me too
But it may confuse some admins, if they see different content in the mail
stream (client received mail) and the stored .eml file.
Thomas
Von: K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com>
An: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>
Datum: 05.06.2017 17:35
Betreff: Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.5.6 build 17151
Your last email was quite helpful and is helping me to understand better.
Thank you again for that. And I found a mistake in my
testing/understanding by retrying some things and re-reading what you've
already said multiple times.
Please, bear with me through just a few more questions and point and then
I think we'll be done.
It's no question that Exchange is sending this info in the envelope, but
it's allowed to do so, we can't change that, nor can we change what other
external SMTP servers do.
And it's worse than "just" Exchange, email clients that send through
ASSP's smtp port also send a single message for multiple bcc recipients.
But, and this is important, I must not have tested incorrectly, because
when now when I set AddIntendedFor to incoming and local, I get exactly
what you describe, the intended for line does NOT appear in the email
client, but does show up in the eml files.
17151 resolves the issue with Exchange and clients sending a single
message for multiple bcc recipients. That's exactly what I want. Maybe
I didn't apply the changes when testing or something. Whatever the case,
this is quite relieving.
Just 2 more quick questions:
1) I think there's going to be serious misunderstanding by people reading
the GUI as to the AddIntendedFor options. Option 0, disabled, is clear,
don't ever add the headers. Option 3, all is also clear, always add the
headers.
But what is being tested for "outgoing" vs "incoming and local" I'm
sure this question sounds completely stupid to you, but I don't understand
your options.
2) You previously mentioned that having the mail stream differ from the
stored eml is bad, or at least I interpreted it that way. It seems like
with the incoming/local only option for AddIntendedFor, the stream and
stored file could be different. I don't see a problem with this, but I'm
worried that you said there could be. Could you explain?
Thanks again for your patience.
Ken
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
DISCLAIMER:
*******************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally
privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the
individual to whom it is addressed.
This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
known virus in this email!
*******************************************************
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
