Got it.
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Thomas Eckardt <thomas.ecka...@thockar.com>
wrote:
> -- means : - remove and - less strict (at config time)
> -+ means : - remove and + strict or enhanced or forced - a some how
> removal level (at runtime)
>
> Who ever uses these switches, has to read and to think about before using
> them.
>
> >And I really like where this seems to be heading - a depreciation of
> level definitions....
>
> There are still over 1000 V1 and several older V2 installations (no
> UserAttach) out there. I think, I must provided the levels for some more
> time, to make an upgrade to V2 more easy.
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Von: K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com>
> An: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Datum: 05.09.2017 14:08
> Betreff: Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.5.6 *Fortress* build 17247
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Nice work! Your detailed descriptions will be quite helpful to many -
> especially me when occasionally having to remember exactly the order that
> things are processed. Thank you.
>
> I worry a little bit about the choice to use -+ as a switch. How about
> changing that to --- (3 dashes) or -_- or something else that doesn't have
> a + in it. I worry that people might confuse the + as some sort of special
> a way of adding a rule (which is wrong) vs negating one at runtime.
>
> And I really like where this seems to be heading - a depreciation of level
> definitions....
>
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 5:54 AM, Thomas Eckardt <
> *thomas.ecka...@thockar.com* <thomas.ecka...@thockar.com>> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> fixed in assp 2.5.6 *Fortress* build 17247:
>
> - ASSP_AFC 4.61 is released
>
> - if any of HTML parsers was selected, the modul was not shown in Module
> Stats screen
>
>
> changed:
>
> - an new exception switch is added to the 'UserAttach' function - ASSP_AFC
> 4.61 is required to provided this also for compressed attachments (zip:...)
>
> description changes:
> ....
> Notice the leading -- in front of the --doc regular expression in the
> last example. The leading -- removes all occurences of this regular
> expression from the resulting entry,
> here from "block-in" (NOT from block!) at configuration time. You would
> need to define --doc in the "block=>" entry as well, to remove such
> occurences there.
> Because the -- exceptions are processed at configuration time, such a
> definition will not overwrite an opposit rule definition: sender >
> recipient and recipient < sender
> - which are combined at runtime (attachment check).
> If you want assp to process such a "remove extension directive" at
> runtime (to make the recipient <> sender rule overwrite working for this
> address),
> use for example -+doc instead of --doc. Be carefull creating weak
> blocking rules using the -+ directive. Make sure the sender and recipient
> address can
> NOT be faked (eg. SPF-strict, DKIM)
> ASSP will resolve all extension regular expression templates and all
> rule tempates and will combine them all in to one resulting domain or user
> attachment rule.
> ASSP will throw a warning, if a rule template is define multipe times -
> like: *@*domain.com* <http://domain.com/>=~~commonRule,~~devRule - here
> ~~devRule already contains ~~commonRule
> It may happen, that the resulting attachment rule contains one or more
> extension regular expressions multiple times - this is harmless and will be
> internaly corrected,
> but try to prevent it.
>
> This feature replaces all of the above level definitions (BadAttachL1
> ....L2 ....), if at least one valid (not zip:... from the ASSP_AFC Plugin)
> attachment blocking
> or allow rule is found for the envelope sender or the first envelope
> recipient of a mail!
> good, good-out and good-in - and also - block, block-out and block-in -
> will be logical OR (pipe '|') combined from the matched rule for the first
> envelope recipient
> and the envelope sender - according to the mail flow.
> The defined blocking rules for the envelope sender and the first
> envelope recipient are than combined together using the same OR logic (pipe
> '|') at runtime.
> The attachment block rules for a specific email are looking as follows:
> (replace block with good to get the attachment good rules)
> incoming mail: recipient-block|recipient-block-in|sender-block|sender-
> block-in
> outgoing mail: sender-block|sender-block-out|recipient-block|recipient-
> block-out
> ....
>
>
> Thomas
>
>
> DISCLAIMER:
> *******************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally
> privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the
> individual to whom it is addressed.
> This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
> known virus in this email!
> *******************************************************
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! *http://sdm.link/slashdot*
> <http://sdm.link/slashdot>
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> *Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net* <Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>
> *https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test*
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot______
> _________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>
>
>
>
> DISCLAIMER:
> *******************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally
> privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the
> individual to whom it is addressed.
> This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
> known virus in this email!
> *******************************************************
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
