Excellent!! Thanks.
On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Thomas Eckardt <thomas.ecka...@thockar.com>
wrote:
> read the changelog
>
> 2017-01-05
> fixed in assp 2.5.6 build 17005:
>
> - the assp.pl autoupdate feature was STILL somehow brocken after 2.5.3
> build 16363
> (hope i've got it fixed)
>
> added:
>
> - copy ham, copy spam and the resend feature have failed, if the 8BITMIME
> SMTP-extension was required by the
> mail content, but were not announced by the MTA
> the hidden configuration parameter 'CCignore8BitMIME' is added to ignore
> this issue - default is '0'
> $main::CCignore8BitMIME = 0;
> # (0/1) CCham, ForwardSpam and resend will ignore a missing 8BITMIME
> extension
>
>
> *- copy ham, copy spam and the resend feature have failed on some
> MS-Exchange MTA's, because duplicate mails*
> * (Message-ID, Date [, To]) were silently delete by the Exchange SPAM
> protection*
> * If this parameter is set to '1', the 'Date:' headerline will be changed
> to the current action time.*
> * default is '0'*
> * $main::CCchangeMSGDate = 0;*
> * # (0/1) change the date: header on CC.. ForwardSpam and resend -
> MS-Exchange may require this,*
> * because duplicate mails may removed silently*
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Von: K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com>
> An: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Datum: 16.09.2017 20:25
> Betreff: Re: [Assp-test] ForceResend blocked PDF
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> I found the problem with ForceResend messages not being received. As you
> suspected, the problem is NOT with ASSP. The problem is with Exchange (of
> course it is, Exchange is exchange after all!).
>
> Because a message with the same message ID and client receive time was
> already received by Exchange (albeit with an attachment stripped), the
> message is deleted by exchange, without notice to the user, sender, or
> sending MTA. It's just categorized as a duplicate.
> *https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/exchange/2004/07/14/how-does-duplicate-detection-work/*
> <https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/exchange/2004/07/14/how-does-duplicate-detection-work/>
>
> So, I can either turn off duplicate detection in Exchange (initially at
> least, this seems like a bad idea) or I can change the message ID or client
> send time (also worrisome). If ASSP was changed to magically alter the
> message ID upon resend, that would cause threading problems right? I guess
> it (or I) could slightly change the sending time. I'd love some feedback
> on what you think is the best approach.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 5:55 AM, Thomas Eckardt <
> *thomas.ecka...@thockar.com* <thomas.ecka...@thockar.com>> wrote:
> 1) X-Assp-ForceResend:YES will skip the attachment check at resend time -
> if the .eml file is removed from the resend folder by assp, the mail was
> sent by assp - check your MTA logs
>
> 2) links in PDF files are wrong if
>
> - it is a weblink with exe, bat, cmd, js, vba, wsh, ps1 - eg. a download
> to an executable file
> - it is a link to a local file: file:// - eg. an open request to a local
> file (windows will open the right app, even the file has a wrong extension)
> for example: the user got a file test.txt which is an exe file not a
> txt and stored it - than the user gets the PDF with the link to this local
> file to start it (there are group policies in AD to prevent this behavior
> in windows!!)
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
>
> Von: K Post <*nntp.p...@gmail.com* <nntp.p...@gmail.com>>
> An: ASSP development mailing list <
> *assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net* <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>>
> Datum: 15.09.2017 21:04
> Betreff: [Assp-test] ForceResend blocked PDF
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> I have a user who received an email that had a blocked PDF because of a
> link in it. The (external) user who created the PDF erroneously has a link
> in it to file:///C:/Users/Michele/Dropbox/Corresponding%
> 20Secretary/Eblasts%202017%202018/*www.an-outside-domain.com/calendar*
> <http://www.an-outside-domain.com/calendar> when she meant to do
> *www.an-outside-domain.com/calendar*
> <http://www.an-outside-domain.com/calendar>
>
>
> Questions:
>
> 1) I added X-Assp-ForceResend:YES to the top of the message and did a
> resend from the GUI. I see the message quickly hit the resendmail folder
> and then disappear as I'd expect. However, the recipient doesn't get the
> mail at all, not even with the attachment still stripped. I confirmed that
> the recipient is listed in the x-assp-intented-for header. What could I be
> missing?
>
> 2) Am I right that AFC would block a pdf with such a link in it? (I like
> that, but want to understand why this particular file is being blocked)
> The message in the .txt file is: prohibited link in PDF file
>
> THanks------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! *http://sdm.link/slashdot*
> <http://sdm.link/slashdot>_______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> *Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net* <Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>
> *https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test*
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test>
>
>
>
>
> DISCLAIMER:
> *******************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally
> privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the
> individual to whom it is addressed.
> This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
> known virus in this email!
> *******************************************************
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! *http://sdm.link/slashdot*
> <http://sdm.link/slashdot>
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> *Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net* <Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>
> *https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test*
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot______
> _________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>
>
>
>
> DISCLAIMER:
> *******************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally
> privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the
> individual to whom it is addressed.
> This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
> known virus in this email!
> *******************************************************
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
