Sorry for the multiple messages on this, but thanks as always for the
update!
When I read "the mail will be *processed as *whitelisted" I got worried
that it would be treated exactly as whitelisted, which could mean added to
the whitelist itself. So, based on your note, I'd suggest changing the
description of DKIMWLAddresses from
If a valid DKIM or DomainKey signature is found and the signature identity
tag (i=u...@domain.tld) matches any of these addresses, the mail will be
processed as Whitelisted.
to
If a valid DKIM or DomainKey signature is found and the signature identity
tag (i=u...@domain.tld) matches any of these addresses, the mail will be
passed and saved as if it were Whitelisted. The message will pass all
filters and will be added to the notspam corpus just like mail from a
whitelisted sender would be. Unlike a true whitelisted sender, no
whitelist address additions will be made
Also, maybe put something in the SenderBase section to let people know that
senderbase matches will be put in okay mail (not in notspam) and that
people might also consider the DKIMWLAddresses to add to the notpspam
corpus if there's a DKIM match?
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 3:24 AM, Thomas Eckardt <thomas.ecka...@thockar.com>
wrote:
> >will this actually add the other non-local addresses to the whitelist
> itself based on the NotGreedyWhitelist setting?
>
> No.
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
>
> Von: "K Post" <nntp.p...@gmail.com>
> An: "ASSP development mailing list" <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.
> net>
> Datum: 18.03.2018 20:34
> Betreff: Re: [Assp-test] New DKIM Whilelisted Addresses Feature
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> SORRY, - I meant to kill the last message and start over, but hit send
> inadvertently.
>
> Thanks again for implementing this.
>
> If there's a match in the DKIM Whitelisted Addresses file will this
> actually add the other non-local addresses to the whitelist itself based on
> the NotGreedyWhitelist setting? I hope not. If so, can we get another
> file option like DKIMTreatAsNotSpamAddresses which would treat the message
> as if it were whitelisted in terms of letting the message through and
> storing it in notspam, but not actually whitelisting the from and other
> addresses?
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 2:22 PM, K Post <*nntp.p...@gmail.com*
> <nntp.p...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Thanks again for implementing this.
>
> Question, if I have something like
> u...@domain.tld
> in the DKIMWLAddresses file
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>
>
>
>
>
> DISCLAIMER:
> *******************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally
> privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the
> individual to whom it is addressed.
> This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
> known virus in this email!
> *******************************************************
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
