I've been running AFC 4.88 for a while now.  I will update to 4.89, but it
doesn't sound like that's it.

I just did a search on "ClamAV: scanned" and see a ton of these lines in
today's log appearing after delivery.  I believe I'm only seeing the logs
when clamav actually catches something after the fact.  Could it NEVER be
scanning the stream itself?  Is there a setting that I have wrong?  What
should I check?

Any other ideas as to why the clam scan seems to fairly regularly be either
skipped or fails during the delivery process?  Could ASSP somehow detect
this problem *before* delivery, scan the file instead of the stream, and
then decide to deliver or not?

Spam's annoying, but if some slips through because of this, I don't really
care.  It's the fear of a detectable true virus being sent through because
ClamAV sometimes isn't working on the stream that's scaring me.

thanks
Ken


On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 11:06 AM Thomas Eckardt <thomas.ecka...@thockar.com>
wrote:

> any of your settings or a bug prevents ASSP_AFC from scanning the mail
>
> >ClamAV: scanned 2805 bytes in file
> messages/okmail/Spam_Subject--3092281.txt
>
> This is a security (post)scan forced by 'ClamAVLogScan'. Stored files are
> scanned, if not already done while processing the mail.
>
> notice: a security BUG was fixed in ASSP_AFC 4.88 and 4.89 ---- some MIME
> types were not correctly detected while processing the mail, but if files
> were scanned - seems you use an outdated ASSP_AFC
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
>
> Von:        "K Post" <nntp.p...@gmail.com>
> An:        "ASSP development mailing list" <
> assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Datum:        09.01.2019 16:45
> Betreff:        [Assp-test] ClamAV catching spam, but still delivered
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hi Thomas,
> Back in July 2018, I started a thread where ClamAV was catching spam, but
> only AFTER delivery.  You suggested that the ASSP_AFC plugin wasn't
> scanning the MIME headers and then fixed that in AFC 4.83.
>
> I just received a report of spam that still came through, despite ClamAV
> catching it.  In reviewing the log, I see a low scoring message being
> delivered and then 1 second later ClamAV via AFC showing a hit.
>
> It's a normal sounding email, so I understand why bayesian / HMM wouldn't
> catch it.  I'm glad that clamav did, but it's pointless if the scan is
> after the delivery right?
>
> The last time I brought this up, you initially said that I have a setting
> that prevents ClamAV from running until after delivery.  Can you tell me
> what that setting is?
> Thanks
>
> log:
>
> Jan-08-19 03:02:54 17771-28711 37.xx.xx.xx.xx <thespam...@spam.xx> to:
> our.u...@ourcharity.org [scoring] DKIM domain-check skipped - spam.xx
> does not support DKIM
> Jan-08-19 03:02:54 17771-28711 37.xx.xx.xx.xx <thespam...@spam.xx> to:
> our.u...@ourcharity.org [scoring] SPF: softfail ip=37.xx.xx.xx.xx
> mailfrom=thespam...@spam.xx helo=*randomhost.com* <http://randomhost.com/>
> Jan-08-19 03:02:54 17771-28711 37.xx.xx.xx.xx <thespam...@spam.xx> to:
> our.u...@ourcharity.org Message-Score: added 5 (spfsValencePB) for SPF
> softfail, total score for this message is now 5
> Jan-08-19 03:02:54 17771-28711 37.xx.xx.xx.xx <thespam...@spam.xx> to:
> our.u...@ourcharity.org checking MX/A for spam.xx , otherspam.xx
> Jan-08-19 03:02:55 17771-28711 37.xx.xx.xx.xx <thespam...@spam.xx> to:
> our.u...@ourcharity.org spam.xx - MX '*mx1.compromised.net*
> <http://mx1.compromised.net/>' - got IP (18.xx.xx.xx)
> Jan-08-19 03:02:55 17771-28711 37.xx.xx.xx.xx <thespam...@spam.xx> to:
> our.u...@ourcharity.org otherspam.xx - MX 'mx2.mail.otherspam.xx' - got
> IP (14.xx.xx.xx)
> Jan-08-19 03:02:55 17771-28711 37.xx.xx.xx.xx <thespam...@spam.xx> to:
> our.u...@ourcharity.org MX found: spam.xx (Mail From: , From) ->
> *mx1.compromised.net* <http://mx1.compromised.net/>
> Jan-08-19 03:02:55 17771-28711 37.xx.xx.xx.xx <thespam...@spam.xx> to:
> our.u...@ourcharity.org A record found for MX: spam.xx (Mail From: ,
> From) -> 18.xx.xx.xx
> Jan-08-19 03:02:55 17771-28711 37.xx.xx.xx.xx <thespam...@spam.xx> to:
> our.u...@ourcharity.org MX found: otherspam.xx (Reply-To) ->
> mx2.mail.otherspam.xx
> Jan-08-19 03:02:55 17771-28711 37.xx.xx.xx.xx <thespam...@spam.xx> to:
> our.u...@ourcharity.org A record found for MX: otherspam.xx (Reply-To) ->
> 14.xx.xx.xx
> Jan-08-19 03:02:55 17771-28711 37.xx.xx.xx.xx <thespam...@spam.xx> to:
> our.u...@ourcharity.org [scoring] found valid PTR *hosted-by-xx.com*
> <http://hosted-by-xx.com/>
> Jan-08-19 03:02:55 17771-28711 37.xx.xx.xx.xx <thespam...@spam.xx> to:
> our.u...@ourcharity.org HMM-Check has given less than 6 results - using
> monitoring mode only
> Jan-08-19 03:02:55 17771-28711 37.xx.xx.xx.xx <thespam...@spam.xx> to:
> our.u...@ourcharity.org HMM Check [monitoring] - Prob: 1.00000 -
> Confidence: 0.00028 => doubtful.spam - answer/query relation: 0% of 137
> Jan-08-19 03:02:55 17771-28711 37.xx.xx.xx.xx <thespam...@spam.xx> to:
> our.u...@ourcharity.org Bayesian Check [scoring] - Prob: 1.00000 -
> Confidence: 0.00000 => doubtful.spam - answer/query relation: 100% of 138
> Jan-08-19 03:02:55 17771-28711 37.xx.xx.xx.xx <thespam...@spam.xx> to:
> our.u...@ourcharity.org Message-Score: added 25 for Bayesian Probability:
> 1.00000, total score for this message is now 30   *WE'RE AT 30*
> Jan-08-19 03:02:55 17771-28711 37.xx.xx.xx.xx <thespam...@spam.xx> to:
> our.u...@ourcharity.org [Plugin] calling plugin ASSP_AFC   *AFC CALLED*
> Jan-08-19 03:02:55 17771-28711 [MessageOK] 37.xx.xx.xx.xx
> <thespam...@spam.xx> to: our.u...@ourcharity.org message ok [ Subject] ->
> messages/okmail/Spam_Subject--3092281.txt
> Jan-08-19 03:02:56 17771-28711 37.xx.xx.xx.xx <thespam...@spam.xx> to:
> our.u...@ourcharity.org info: PB-IP-Score for '37.xx.xx.xx.xx' is 5,
> added 5 in this session
> Jan-08-19 03:02:56 17771-28711 37.xx.xx.xx.xx <thespam...@spam.xx> to:
> our.u...@ourcharity.org finished message - received DATA size: 1.87 kByte
> - sent DATA size: 2.97 kByte
> Jan-08-19 03:02:56 17771-28711 37.xx.xx.xx.xx <thespam...@spam.xx> to:
> our.u...@ourcharity.org disconnected: session:11EAAF22 37.xx.xx.xx.xx -
> processing time 5 seconds *DELIVERED*
> Jan-08-19 03:02:56 17771-28711 37.xx.xx.xx.xx <thespam...@spam.xx> to:
> our.u...@ourcharity.org ClamAV: scanned 2805 bytes in file
> messages/okmail/Spam_Subject--3092281.txt - FOUND
> winnow.spam.ts.xmailer.2.UNOFFICIAL   *Spam (Virus) found 1 second after
> AFC called*
> Jan-08-19 03:02:56 17771-28711 37.xx.xx.xx.xx <thespam...@spam.xx> to:
> our.u...@ourcharity.org deleting spamming safelisted tuplet:
> (37.48.120.0,spam.xx) age: 3s
> Jan-08-19 03:02:56 17771-28711 37.xx.xx.xx.xx <thespam...@spam.xx> to:
> our.u...@ourcharity.org Message-Score: added 50 (vdValencePB) for virus
> detected: 'winnow.spam.ts.xmailer.2.UNOFFICIAL', total score for this
> message is now 80  *ADDED 50, but only after delivery*
>
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>
>
>
>
> DISCLAIMER:
> *******************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally
> privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the
> individual to whom it is addressed.
> This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
> known virus in this email!
> *******************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

Reply via email to