okay, thanks. I thought that if I didn't define a block for an address, that it would just assume no block.
So to allow everything and anything to an address I would need to do: ale...@ourcharity.org => block => .nonsense, good => .* right? Assuming there would never be a file with a .nonsense extension. using your explanation, wouldn't that be the same as ale...@ourcharity.org => block => .nonsense without the good definition? On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 1:13 AM Thomas Eckardt <thomas.ecka...@thockar.com> wrote: > The logic behind is (and ever was) - block any bad OR any not good. IF > (there is a bad rule AND the attached is bad) OR (there is a good rule AND > the attached is NOT good) . > > simple example: > > *@domain => block => .jar, good => .* > > This blocks all .jar and passes all other. > good =>.* is the same like not defining 'good'. > > Thomas > > > > > DISCLAIMER: > ******************************************************* > This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally > privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the > individual to whom it is addressed. > This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no > known virus in this email! > ******************************************************* > > _______________________________________________ > Assp-test mailing list > Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test >
_______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
