>Is this wrong?

No.

Thomas






Von:    "Daniel Miller via Assp-test" <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>
An:     assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Kopie:  "Daniel Miller" <dmil...@amfes.com>
Datum:  07.06.2019 22:29
Betreff:        Re: [Assp-test] localaddresses_flat vs localdomains



I'm presently using VRFY as the only source of valid local 
senders/recipients. Using only localDomains it didn't seem to work 100% 
- having the same definition for both localDomains & localAddresses_Flat 
does work for me now. Is this wrong?


Daniel

On 6/5/2019 10:50 PM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> it means:
> 
> don't do VRFY definitions in LocalAddresses_Flat - do them in 
localDomains
> 
> If both parameters contain a VRFY definition for the same domain, the 
> one in localDomains has a higher priority (and is used).
> 
> Thomas
> 
> 
> 
> Von: "Daniel Miller via Assp-test" <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>
> An: "assp-test" <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Kopie: "Daniel Miller" <dmil...@amfes.com>
> Datum: 06.06.2019 07:14
> Betreff: [Assp-test] localaddresses_flat vs localdomains
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> I'm confused by the help text for LocalAddresses_Flat - "NOTICE: The
> VRFY definition described below is deprecated in this configuration
> parameter - use localDomains instead!"
> 
> Does this mean when using VRFY only localDomains is required? Or does it
> mean the help text for LocalAddresses_Flat is wrong - and if so please
> either update or delete it.
> 
> -- 
> Daniel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> DISCLAIMER:
> *******************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, 
> legally privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the 
> use of the
> individual to whom it is addressed.
> This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no 
> known virus in this email!
> *******************************************************
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
> 


_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test






DISCLAIMER:
*******************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally 
privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the 

individual to whom it is addressed.
This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no 
known virus in this email!
*******************************************************


_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

Reply via email to