On Wed Jun 12 2019 01:39:08 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Thomas
Eckardt <thomas.ecka...@thockar.com> wrote:
> >integrate ASSP as a post-queue filter using amavisd-new
>
> Don't try this! Use assp instead of amavis-new. The postfix config
> should be the same in both cases. The listeners and targets in assp
> should be configured according to amavis-new (the same way).

Ok, so, to be clear...

In your first response to my question, you said:

"I never used assp this way. It may be possible to implement assp as a
milter or like amavis-new, but the postfix config and the assp config
will become very complex (IMHO). It may be also the case, that some assp
features will not work like expected:  for example block reporting, the
email interface and resend functions. I think you'll need separate
listeners for this purposes."

So, are you now saying that using ASSP *instead of* amavisd-new, I'll be
able to use it and expect the block reporting email interface and
re-send functions to work as advertised?

In other words, this would be a supported way of using ASSP, and if I
had issues, I could come to the list for help and not expect to be told
that 'you are using ASSP in an unsupported way so we cannot help'?

I don't mind dealing with problems if this is an unusual but still
supported configuration, as long as I can expect some help fixing any
issues if/when they arise.

> For outgoing mails, the config would be different. You'll need to
> implement a second post-filter in postfix, with assp's relayPort as
> target.

No worries, I'll do whatever is needed, including setting up multiple
postfix instances if necessary.

Thanks!
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

Reply via email to