I understand that using the wildcard in the block report group includes
all, including those that are in the [SPAM-ONLY-RECIPIENTS] groupthat the
filter is using.  ASSP is working as designed, I just am looking to discuss
alternatives.

The only alternative that I know of would be to have a huge list that I
maintain of good addresses that's a duplicate of ValidAddresses (so again 2
lists to keep in sync).

Even if I had ValidAddresses and the block report group include a
singularly maintained file, our @subdomain1.OurCharity.org is a wildcard
domain used by a ticketing system and others.  I need to see blocked email
there, but there's some addresses which are only spam.

Would it be a big deal to give the option to have BlockReportFilter matches
not show up on the block report.  OR, even better just appear as a summary
at the bottom of the report?  That way I could go through the daily report
without needing to skip over the filtered notification, but on days when
there is extra time or curiosity, I could still see counts at the bottom of
the report for stuff that's been filtered.

My desire would be to have:
1) BlockReportFilter accept a group definition (which could be used
elsewhere, like [SPAM-ONLY-RECIPIENTS])
2) The block report itself showing only a summary at the bottom of the
count of messages for those addresses which are filtered out

Nothing urgent, just a wishlist.
thanks

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 7:07 AM Thomas Eckardt <thomas.ecka...@thockar.com>
wrote:

> This group is wrong
>
> [block-report-gr...@ourcharity.org]
> *@OurCharity.org
> *@*subdomain1.OurCharity.org* <http://subdomain1.ourcharity.org/>
> *@OtherCharityWeHost.org
>
>
> it contains also (IMHO) all [SPAM-ONLY-RECIPIENTS]  !!!!
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
>
> Von:        "K Post" <nntp.p...@gmail.com>
> An:        "ASSP development mailing list" <
> assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Datum:        27.04.2020 21:44
> Betreff:        Re: [Assp-test] BlockReportFilter accept groups?
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> (sorry hit send by mistake)
>
> I'm sorry that I didn't explain myself well initially.  I'll try again
> with more detail.
>
> I've got a group definition of collection addresses, mailboxes that get
> nothing but spam.  I've got that defined as a group like this:
> [SPAM-ONLY-RECIPIENTS]
> olduser....@ourcharity.org
> honeypot.1...@ourcharity.org
> .... about 100 others
>
> Then in spamAddresses, I've got
> [SPAM-ONLY-RECIPIENTS]
>
> This does a nice job of accurately keeping the corpus correct.
>
> I also get a block report every day for ALL spam that's rejected, for
> everyone.  I've got a [block-report-gr...@ourcharity.org] group defined
>
> [block-report-gr...@ourcharity.org]
> *@OurCharity.org
> *@*subdomain1.OurCharity.org* <http://subdomain1.ourcharity.org/>
> *@OtherCharityWeHost.org
>
> The block report is defined to run at midnight like this:
>
> [block-report-gr...@ourcharity.org]=>m...@ourcharity.org=>1
>
>
> This works great, but there's so much spam that I need to go through (some
> of the stuff our charity handles is very sensitive and unfortunately
> contains common phrases and tops often found in spam), so it needs my
> manual review.  No choice there, I wish there was.
>
> I can put the addresses that appear in [SPAM-ONLY-RECIPIENTS] manually in
> BlockReportFilter, but that means maintaining the list in 2 places, the
> group and BlockReportFilter.  I was hoping that BlockReportFilter would
> accept a group to make things more simple.
>
> Also, is there an option to not display even the header for filtered out
> addresses?  Currently, I get lines like this for each spam-only-recipient
>
> spamo...@ourcharity.org no blocked  <-- even though 64 emails were,
> they're just filtered)
>
> 64 lines skipped on global defined filter regex 'BlockReportFilter'
>
> It would be fantastic if anything on the BlockFilter simply didn't show up
> at all on the block report.
>
> And last, my unable to transfer to a worker issues continue and are far
> more pressing than this request of convenience.  Any thoughts you could
> provide on that front would be most helpful.
>
> Thank you as always.
> Ken
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 3:32 PM K Post <*nntp.p...@gmail.com*
> <nntp.p...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> I'm sorry that I didn't explain myself well.
>
> I've got a group definition of collection addresses, mailboxes that get
> nothing but spam.  I've got that defined as a group like this:
> [SPAM-ONLY-RECIPIENTS]
> olduser....@ourcharity.org
> honeypot.1...@ourcharity.org
> .... about 100 others
>
> Then in spamAddresses, I've got
> [SPAM-ONLY-RECIPIENTS]
>
> This does a nice job of accurately keeping the corpus correct.
>
> I also get a block report every day for ALL spam that's rejected, for
> everyone.  I've got a
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 4:35 AM Thomas Eckardt <
> *thomas.ecka...@thockar.com* <thomas.ecka...@thockar.com>> wrote:
> The most left parameter defines the list of email addresses.
> Why should anyone define a wrong group/list there and tries to correct
> this mistake using the BlockReportFilter.
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> Von:        "K Post" <*nntp.p...@gmail.com* <nntp.p...@gmail.com>>
> An:        "ASSP development mailing list" <
> *assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net* <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>>
> Datum:        24.04.2020 16:56
> Betreff:        [Assp-test] BlockReportFilter accept groups?
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Should BlockReportFilter be able to accept [GROUP] definitions?
>
> I've got a group of email addresses defined that I use in the
> spamAddresses configuration file.  That works great.  Spam to these
> addresses are always spam.  I no longer want to have them show in my master
> block report.  I know I can copy those addresses to the BlockReportFilter,
> but I am hoping to have that same group just listed in the filter.  When I
> do that, I get a regex error.
> • -  regex error in: BlockReportFilter
>
> I'm guessing BlockReportFilter isn't groups aware.  Would it be difficult
> to add that in a future release?
>
> Thanks_______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> *Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net* <Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>
> *https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test*
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test>
>
>
>
>
> DISCLAIMER:
> *******************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally
> privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the
> individual to whom it is addressed.
> This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
> known virus in this email!
> *******************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> *Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net* <Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>
> *https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test*
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test>
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>
>
>
>
> DISCLAIMER:
> *******************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally
> privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the
> individual to whom it is addressed.
> This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
> known virus in this email!
> *******************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

Reply via email to