Hi all,

in the forum we came across a problem.

Assume message-ID signing and/or BATV-tagging is configured.

Mails to local webmaster@... or postmaster@... are currenty never blocked 
for a missing message-Id signature (except the mail matches redRe). This 
also applies to a bad BATV.

The logic behind this behavior is not fully clear.

These checks are only done for bounce mails (senders are: BounceSenders , 
postmaster@ , null sender <>). Thinking about BounceSenders and null 
sender - these sender addresses are only used for NDR's, but a NDR should 
be checked by these features. Remains the mails sent by a foreign 
postmaster to the local postmaster - which can be important mails (eg 
informations about abuse, miss configuration or other problems). They will 
fail the backscatter checks to 100%, because the sender is a BounceSender 
and those mails will never contain valid message signatures or BATV-tags.

1. I'll remove the webmaster check - this makes no sense to me
2. I'll continue to skip the message signature/BATV check for mails 
postmaster->postmaster

It is currently unclear to me, how we can detect abuse mails 
postmaster->postmaster. Most of such mails are SPAM. But some of those 
mails may contain important information, and they can be written in 
english or any local language and the may contain even spammy content (eg. 
in explanations).

Now, someone may ask: if a foreign admin wants to contact a postmaster, 
will he/she use the postmaster address as sender address? - IMHO no, but 
I'm not sure.

In my opinion, the current logic should be completely removed - even a 
very small amount of mails (postmaster->postmaster) will be blocked.

suggestions are welcome

Thomas


DISCLAIMER:
*******************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally 
privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the 

individual to whom it is addressed.
This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no 
known virus in this email!
*******************************************************


_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

Reply via email to