On 6 Sep 2006 at 23:25, Paul Hutchinson wrote: > Why not ?
Well here are two reasons off the top of my head: 1. The example doesn't seem to have any particular purpose - it's the example of executables from level 1 followed by '.zip', where '.' could be any character as it isn't escaped. Do these have any special significance? After all, if you want to block zips, you can just add 'zip' - as in the level 3 example. 2. On some browsers, the example doesn't wrap in the display area and you have to horizontally scroll to see the end of the single line of text. > Seriously, it depends on the level of attachment blocking you want to > enforce. You may be happy receiving zips. you may want to stop them. Which the level 2 example hardly achieves. > It's up to you as to which levels are activated. Hence my original question. I'm not having a go at you - it's just that I don't know the history as to why that example was chosen. Maybe there's a good reason which I'm completely missing. Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
