My point is that, assuming the Blocked File Extensions list is run on an incoming email before the ClamAV is, those files would be dropped before they had an opportunity to crash the AV scanner.
-----Original Message-----
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 9:35 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Dont forget to keep ClamAV patched (if you are us ing it)

Roger Stevenson wrote:
There's a PE file vulnerability, too.  Would these be defeated by adding CHM and PE files the Blocked File Extensions list?

I wouldn't say they are "defeated", but if you don't let them in, then they can't infect you or your users:

   http://www.asspsmtp.org/wiki/Blocking_Attachments

PS:  PE is a type of encapsulated application (portable executable), not a file extension.

   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_Executable
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user

Reply via email to