> >if the analysis that michael did, and the logs he posted are real, >yes, i'd >call that a bug. At least for what is my idea of a antispam strategy. > >do you think the logs are not real, the analysis is wrong, or that >accepting >an email, even with invalid helo is correct behaviour ?
The mail was caught (by Bayesian) not accepted. The situation for every mail is different and very much complex different. Micheal is claiming, that the helo check and the bomb check is not working in such cases. If have no secondary hint to such a problem, so i am asking again, can you confirm it from your experience? fritz ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
