>>Correct me if I am wrong, but wouldn't bayesian testmode still >>require users >>to report invalid emails? And hence the exact problem that I am >>trying to >>circumvent? > > > No, if you set it up right. > > Set spamsubject to ""- > > Set logging mode to 7. > > Use CCALLSPAM to do reporting.
I assume you mean logging mode for just Bayesian spam/nonspam to 7? Or just the Bayesian spam? If I do this though, doesn't it mean that I would have to go through each email one-by-one? I'm guessing that RBL & delaying will definitely help cut down on the pounding I'm getting, but over the weekend alone, my own accounts accumulated more than 1500 pieces of email, of which, probably 1400 were spam. I can't even begin to imagine how long it would take me to go through them all. If I cc both bayesian spam & nonspam (setting both log settings to 7), then I would basically be receiving all emails, wouldn't I? Would I then be able to select all spam and submit to the asspspam & asspnotspam address as a single email with hundreds of attachments? There are privacy issues at stake here too; I may end up reading someone's legit email, which is definitely a concern. Thanks! Eric ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
