Eric B. wrote:
> indicates that the documentation is old and quite possibly outdated. So I
> can't really blame new people asking about documentation when the site
> itself says that it is outdated. :) Perhaps until the Wiki is fully
> populated with all the old information, that we should remove that
> disclaimer in the old site and say that it is incomplete, referring people
> to the Wiki for updated documentation instead of saying that it is outdated.
> Similarly, the Wiki should possibly point back to the old doc site
> indicating that it is a good primer. Maybe also some disclaimers that the
> section(s) on RBL are no longer valid (they suggest not using RBL and just
> using the shared greylist).
("possibly" != "is"). I don't know who wrote that, but perhaps it
should be reworded. The underlying docs might be "old", but they are
*very* relevant, and that has been stated on the list (and in the
archives (and Nabble.com is a great way to search the archives)) on
numerous occasions. The docs have not been updated for the newer
features. That's why the Wiki was created - if only more people would
get involved...
The Wiki is what people make of it. If you see something that should be
there, put it there, or talk about it on a discussion tab. Talking
about the Wiki /here/gets nothing done /on/ the Wiki.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
