Eric B. wrote:
> "Doug Traylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> As an admin, how do you notice these things? Do you verify the spam
>>> reports that your users send in, or are you noticing them in your
>>> own account(s)? <snip>
>>> How did you realize that this was an issue for you?
>>
>> I cc all spam to an account I manage. I have MTA rules sort the spam
>> based on "assp spam reason" and in some cases also by "assp intended
>> for" for bayesian only spam. Then I use a plain text email reader
>> to flip through the spams that are not bayesian to make sure nothing
>> bad is happening and I flip through the bayesian emails to see if
>> something obvious is getting through that I can block with a regex. Every
>> so often I delete all the spams I have collected as the
>> folders tend to get large fast.
>
>
> Very cool. Thanks for the tip. Right now, I'm just collecting
> everything in a simple email inbox, and flipping through them that
> way. Are you still running test mode for checks other than Bayesian?
> If not, wouldn't bayesian be the only email that you would get as
> ASSP spam reason? Wouldn't all the rest be rejected at source? Or
> do those still get copied over into the ccAllSpam address?
>
> Do you know if there is a list somewhere (wiki, docs, archives), of
> all the different reasons that ASSP uses to flag spam? So far, I
> have found the following, but would love to compile a complete list.
> X-Assp-Spam-Reason: Has spam address
> X-Assp-Spam-Reason: Validate Sender: Invalid HELO Format 'node9'
> X-Assp-Spam-Reason: Bayesian spam
> X-Assp-Spam-Reason: Validate Sender: PTR missing
> X-Assp-Spam-Reason: BombRe:
> 'src=3D"cid:000d01c2fa73$e21e8830$91853959@migint"'
> X-Assp-Spam-Reason: Validate Sender: missing MX/A record
> X-Assp-Spam-Reason: Failed RBL checks
>
Many people have Outlook Express as their mail reader software. I don't
know of any way to automatically direct mail to different mail directories
based on header contents with Outlook Express. If there is a way to do
that, please tell me how.
If there's no way to bucket mail via header lines with OE, ASSP could enable
a method if it had subject text fields that are configurable for each type
of spam reason; instead of just [SPAM] we would have [RBL FAIL], [BAYESIAN
FAIL], etc.
Worthwhile?
Regards,
Dave
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
