>Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 08:53:07 +0100 >From: "Wim Borghs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >2006/12/15, Nick Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> * I received no comments on my suggestion of a relayPortNP: option. >> For those who want to use (easily) the relay port for SRS only. Was >> it that much of a silly idea?
>Is SRS working for you? I saw ASSP not rewriting the sender-address some time ago when I was testing it. If I remember correctly it never rewrote the >sender address because sub serverIsSmtpDestination always returned true at my site. SRS appears to be working fine for me (1.2.6 various though haven't thoroughly checked 1.2.7 various). >>* Also to save a section, spf & srs sections could be merged? >I like them apart. I think this comes from srs being something you should do if your site uses forwarding so sites receiving the forwarded mail can check >spf but srs doesn't help your own ability to check spf. (correctly put?) Fair enough, just that the left hand index of options is getting rather long! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
