On 9 Jan 2007 at 10:09, Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > > > I understand what PB is now, but I'd still like to be able weight > >test and give each e-mail a final spam score. I envision it working > >like PB. The user weights each test. After each test, its score is > >added to a total, and if the total ever surpasses a user-defined > >limit, testing stops and the e-mail is rejected. > > I am not sure, that I will this implement for all tests, but anyway, > this is exactly what happens, if you choose *score only* in the > different sender validation tests. That you overlooked it, is my > argument, not to implement it everywhere. > > fritz
Just my 2 cents worth here...I would really like PB to be implemented for ALL tests because it's more confusing to only _partly_ implement it. I have every option available to score _only_, mainly because of the highly spammy nature of my email from a bayesian standpoint. I have legit email that has invalid LOCALHOST settings (even though I have contacted the legit mailers about the issue). I have some legit mailers that have landed in SORBS or SpamCop for whatever reason, but are OK otherwise. To be able to score and eventually reject based upon my penalty threshold is how I envision the PB working. Is this how it works, or am I missing something here? Amy Stinson Amy's Answers, LLC email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.amys-answers.com phone: 317.885-1741 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
