Patrick Butts wrote:
> Now you've even puzzled me more.  So I should leave the subject on 
> filenames turned on for the rebuild script, even after going off test.
>   

Sorry.  For some reason I answered that backwards.  The reason for using
subjects as filenames is so you can easily identify messages in the
corpus's while you are initially running ASSP.  You can consider it
another type of test-mode to use while you initially build the corpus's
and confirm that ASSP is running properly.

>> Gotcha.  So does ASSP do the moving then?  Because I would think if the 
>> email is in the spam folder and I reported it as not spam but it still 
>> exists when the database is rebuilt... it would still be seen as spam... 
>> or is there where the error directory comes in?
>>     

ASSP does not move messages.  The messages are handled differently that
the regular corpus folders - because they are errors.  I cannot recall
the weighting process that is used for error processing, but these
messages should stay in their own folders.

Error reported messages get heavier weighting in the Bayesian database
to compensate for the initial false-negative or false-positive word
weighting condition..

> Do you ever worry about a missed email because it's blocked?  Even if I 
> tested for weeks, I sure an email would slip into the spam void every 
> once in awhile after I went off testmode.  Yes, I realize I could leave 
> that on so it doesn't, but my question is, don't YOU worry about a 
> missed email.  Is the general consensus that after good training, it 
> operates pretty flawlessly?  I ask because I really am thinking of 
> leaving it in test mode so I don't miss an email.
>   

It happens.  Typically the person will contact the intended recipient,
and that person will make certain they get added to the whitelist.  The
real problem is if the message comes from an automated source - as no
one might notice that a message was blocked unless they realize a
message they should have gotten had never come in.  For me, this is the
only issue I have ever had with ASSP - that is if you want to call it an
issue.  But remember, ASSP is intended to be an administrative hands-off
solution.  The users should be educated to know that they may need to
pre-whitelist an address via the email interface.  They should make it a
practice.

> Gotcha.  So even though a spam email isn't passed to the MTA, it will 
> still go into the folder to maintain a good spam filter.
>   

For the most part yes.  But not all blocked messages goto the spam
corpus.  Some messages may be excluded completely based on the
configured logging settings.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user

Reply via email to