Yes, I meant the "to" field.

Charles Marcus wrote:
> Dave Emory wrote:
>> Hello, All.
>> 
>> I did some testing of the IP address number-of-connections limit
>> function, and found a behavior that you should be aware of if you
>> use this function. The mailer I used to send the test messages makes
>> a new connection for each email address in the "from" field.  If the
>> number of recipients in the from field
> 
> Eh? Recipients? In the FROM field?? That would be 'senders', and why
> would there be more than one in the 'From:' field?
> 
> I'm guessing you meant 'TO:', 'CC:' and 'BCC:' fields?
> 
> Making a separate connection for each in the TO/CC fields doesn't make
> sense, but maybe it does for the BCC field?
> 
>> exceeds the max SMTP ip connections limit, the IP address will be
>> blocked and get a PB score (if enabled).  Blocking starts as soon as
>> the limit is exceeded, so some mail will not be delivered.  I
>> reduced the frequency test duration due to this issue so the
>> function still helps prevent denial-of-service, but mail isn't
>> blocked for the default 3600 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user

Reply via email to