I agree billc, my users have often requested a per user quarantine that 
they can view and respond appropriately on without having mail tagged 
and delivered to their mail client. The majority of my users hate tagged 
email but also do not like the idea of not knowing if something was 
blocked / discarded. Without this ASSP has still been working very well 
and my favorite anti-spam solution to date.


Kind regards,
Elvar



billc wrote:
> At 1:58 PM -0400 5/7/07, Charles Marcus wrote:
>   
>> The *only* potential thing that it has that ASSP doesn't is per-user
>> settings/quarantine. As someone else pointed out, this generally only
>> matters to large installs like ISPs, where their customers 'demand' it.
>>
>>     
>
> Though my customers are generally not tech savvy enough to know to 
> ask, we are a small ISP/webhost and would like to be able to have a 
> per-user quarantine area.  That would take some of the whining off of 
> me.  Though I'm well aware that they can do that themselves when 
> they're configured as Spam Lovers (and I do use it when necessary), 
> having a per-user quarantine area on the server would lower the 
> number of emails they'd have to download on a normal basis.
>
> If they didn't ever look in it and it auto-deleted the old stuff 
> nightly or weekly it would still serve the purpose of being able to 
> offer it and being the place they could look when their precious ebay 
> notices or whatever get caught by the filters.
>
> Otherwise, ASSP is doing a fine job.  But it never hurts to look at 
> what 'the competition' is doing.
>
>   



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user

Reply via email to