Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
> Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
>> It was not a mistake, I run exactly that.
>
> In addition to the bombRe it makes perfect sense. Thanks again for
> turning me on to that.
It still doesn't make sense to me. If the regex is for catching spam, why
do you want the spammer to be treated as redlisted?
The user interface says:
If an email matches this Perl regular expression it will be considered
redlisted. The redlist is a list of addresses that cannot contribute to the
whitelist, and who are not considered local, even if their mail is from a
local computer. For example, if someone goes on a vacation and turns on
their email's autoresponder, put them on the redlist until they return. Then
as they reply to every spam they receive they won't corrupt your non-spam
collection or whitelist: \[autoreply\]
Redlisted addresses will not be added to the whitelist. Redlisted messages
will not be stored in the SPAM/NOTSPAM-collection. As all fields marked by *
this field accepts a list separated by | or a specified file
'file:files/redre.txt' .
And there's a separate charset variable (bombCharSets) in the Regex section
for these strings.
Dave
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
