Matti Haack wrote: > If I would be a spammer, I would use that instead: > http://neil.fraser.name/software/img2html/
I don't know if that'd be so helpful for a spammer, or the receiving end. It increases the size of the email. And I think it'd be trivial to filter out the resulting html clutter as spam. Quoting the site: "Tables are an inefficient way of encoding detailed graphics. A normal image file takes about two bytes to encode each pixel. By contrast the HTML version takes nearly fifty bytes to do the same. This means the size of the file is very large." Greetings, Jeroen ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
