On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 18:05 -0700, Jeroen van Aart wrote: > William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > > > However it's still good to know/clarify that CPU usage in stats != REAL > > CPU usage. Because I have had problems with that, and will not move to > > 1.3.x till I know for a fact. Any 100% REAL CPU usage issues are > > resolved. > > I have said before that I have no problems with 1.3.1, on debian. As far > as I know any of the issues mentioned were introduced in a version after > 1.3.1.
I had packaged that once on Gentoo with help of some outside contributors. But the last patch that a contributor gave me for 1.3.1 had some paths off.Didn't have time to make patch myself, quite large with 1.3.x. Newer versions were out so I just elected to package those versions and completely forgot about 1.3.1. I will look to resurrect past 1.3.1 efforts and make a ebuild for 1.3.1 on Gentoo. Providing that a new release is not imminent. Since my previous 1.3.1 efforts were negated with a newer release. Thanks for the info though. Also wonder why 1.3.3.1 has not been withdrawn and official current release rolled back to 1.3.1? Or something since I believe 1.3.3.1 is problematic on several fronts. -- William L. Thomson Jr. Gentoo/Java
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
