William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > Is the date not considered at all? Seems like it would be more effective to > toss older spam in favor of keeping more current spam. Otherwise one might > say rebuild the bayesian db mostly off older spam. Instead of current > patterns. Unless that's also part of the random design. > My own experience has been even with randomness, the contents of the spam and notspam folders is rarely more than a month or a month and a half old, so it seems pretty current to me. Perhaps the MaxFiles is too large? If one is worried about currency, then looking at the content of the error folder would make more sense.
--jimm -- Jimm Wetherbee | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Information Systems Librarian | Voice: 704-233-8092 E.K. Smith Library | Fax: 704-233-8254 Wingate University | http://library.wingate.edu/staff/jmw/ Wingate, NC 28174 | lux et fides ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
