Matti Haack wrote: > As they do it public, it shouldn't be such a problem. And you > trust google (which collects your queries for shure) and misstrust > opendns. Where is the difference? (besides that google is a > multi-billion monopolist)
Not to spark a debate, but Google is not a monopolist. Market domination != monopoly. Back on track - I don't like the idea of using DNS servers that manipulate the real IP address that is being queried. Whether you choose to trust OpenDNS at the present time or not, you have no control whether or not the make a policy change or a mistake. Personally, I think the idea in general is poorly conceived. DNS should be local/close, and cache-able. I understand that some ppl are hurting (or like to pretend they are) for $, etc, but DNS is too important to a spam filter to be mucking around.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
