MD, Just want to point out that using the catchall setting will result in senders not realizing they are sending to an invalid address and repeatedly sending to wrong addresses. Senders will be under the impression your organization is just not good about communicating with them since they assume you received the messages. Without the catchall, they will get an immediate system-generated response stating the address is wrong and they can pursue an alternate method of contact or check their spelling, etc.
The other side is if you use a catchall you will need to come up with a maintenance and data management plan for the hoards of garbage that you will be collecting. Steve -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michelle Dupuis Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 9:27 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Assp-user] Catchall email account Because of our MTA's limitations (Exchange 2007 all-in-one setup), I am unable to implement a catchall account in Exchange. Does ASSP offer the ability to rewrite the TO address of an email that the MTA refuses (or ASSP determines does not exist), sending it instead to a catchall account? (I'm still on version 1.3.3.1 of ASSP)? Thanks MD ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
