Travis Forghani wrote: > A long time ago when I was working on the Win32 Quick Guide, I think > either someone on the list stated something along the lines of reports > causing spam that made it into the notspam folder to be removed or I > induced (or is it deduced) it from the many conversations between myself > and other members on the list. I really can't remember. The good thing > is that thanks to my Stat class and really looking at my settings it > clicked in my head that I should either allow ASSP to put the ok status > mail in the default folder or have it discard them. I chose to discard > them.
It's long been a feature request/assumed behavior so perhaps that's where it came in. In order for ASSP to remove messages like that it would have to parse the reported message, then search the existing corpus for matching content and delete each file that matches. Since file I/O is typically blocking this is really bad for ASSP and not really feasible to ever be included in ASSP. ASSP currently handles this situation by scoring content from messages reported via the email interface higher than those in the normal corpus so a message reported to ASSP will nullify a similar message in the collected corpus when creating the Bayesian database. Discarding "OKmail" messages is the best option unless you sort the collected messages by hand. Kevin ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
