On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 10:41:29AM -0400, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote: > Greg Wright wrote: >> It's a bit of interest your fellow admins can share. If you don't like >> the semantics of the terms used in ASSP, don't harp on about it on the >> forum, put in a change request!!! > > Because I'm tired of dealing with the developers. > > But to discuss something openly without applying the context you speak of - > makes no sense, and someone will always question it - until it is validated > as being something that its rightful definition does not reflect. Its the > nature of who we are as technical people. > > I might not be a developer, but I am an administrator. Uptime has a very > specific meaning in my profession.
Which isn't even the same "uptime" we're discussing here. The context was well exposed by the first poster who created this thread. You guys are just splitting hairs. To ignore the obvious contextual cues to which we're discussing "uptime" is just being a pedant for pedant's sake. It's completely obvious that the uptime we're all discussing is global uptime since last reset. The fact that someone even took issue with that is a bit ridiculous in the first place. -cl ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
