OK thanks all. I will stay away from 2.0 on the principle "if something works, don't change it" :P
I'm sure one day there will only be the multi-threaded version supported...it's only natural! -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 3:30 AM To: [email protected]; For Users of ASSP Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Upgrade question On 19 Jun 2009 at 15:25, Melvin wrote: > My understanding was also that 2.x had a much higher hardware > requirement, possibly due to the multi-thread part of things, but it was > definitely aimed at high volume sites whereas the 1.x branch was pretty > much still anything across the spectrum with HW requirements depending > on volume. 2.x was an attempt to extend/optimize the high end of the > spectrum. Pretty much as I understand it, but I didn't want to go into any performance/requirement comparisons as v2 is still an evolving beast. Maybe, one day, there will be no difference. :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference! Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250. Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today! http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.o rg _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference! Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250. Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today! http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
