Hello when someone send a whitelist request using email interface and whitelist a domain name or email, ASSP add this in whitelist
[email protected]?1269954258 or this [email protected]?1269954258 Could it possible to have this format instead (per user) [email protected]?localdomainx.com?1269954258 where localdomainx is the authenticated local domain which required the whitelist . In this way [email protected] will be white ONLY for localdomainx.com and not for all users in the server. In a similar way should work also the automatic whitelisting , for example if localdomainx.com which is local, send an email to [email protected] , ASSP should create add this [email protected]?localdomainx.com?1269954258 The same should be done also for assp-notwhite , assp-of , assp-red , rebuildspamdb .. Personally I think that managing all "per user" instead of "server wide" could be useful for following reason 1) sometime a local user could whitelist or put in noprocessing (using assp-of) big domain names like yahoo.com , hotmail.com .. it could not be good since sometime spam could come from them 2) sometime an hacker could be able to send email from the server running ASSP, and he could able to send thousand outgoing spam email . All these email will go in whitelist (if automatic whitelisting is enabled) . After the spammer activity has been stopped is not so easy to clean whitelist from all the lines added by the hacker action. 3) currently is hard to know who is adding email to whitelist (only investigating current logs is possible) 4) suppose the client localdomainx.com leave the server and migrate on another server ; With a whitelist structure like this [email protected]?localdomainx.com?1269954258 could be easy to remove all his whitelist entries .Currently it's not possible . What do you think ? Graziano ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
