On Jun 17, 2010, at 6:03 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > For Users of ASSP <[email protected]> writes: >> >> Is there any reason why this is a bad idea? > > It is superfluous. Set EmailSpam to "spam" . Thats it.
If I do that and I send to [email protected], I get a rejection because there is no [email protected]. This is an Exchange server, so internal mail does not interface via SMTP. The routing is thus: User --> Exchange --> local-address User --> Exchange --> ASSP via send-connector --> external-address So, if I want user to have a friendly local address to send spam to, I don't see any other way than forwarding it from Exchange. Am I missing something? -- Mark Edwards Audiovisual Coordinator & IT Assistant Contemporary Jewish Museum 736 Mission Street San Francisco, CA 94103 direct line: 415.655.7802 fax: 415.655.7815 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
