[email protected] on Fri, 25 Jun 2010 06:05:57 -0400 wrote to "GrayHat" <[email protected]>
to whoever handles this list; please REMOVE the above address from the list; every time I mail to the list I get back a message like the following one (headers included) Return-Path: <[email protected]> X-Flags: 0000 Delivered-To: GMX delivery to [email protected] Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2010 10:09:36 -0000 Received: from mail.pap.state.ga.us (EHLO paptestsrv.pap.state.ga.us) [167.193.84.25] by mx0.gmx.net (mx013) with SMTP; 25 Jun 2010 12:09:36 +0200 Received: from smtp [10.1.100.125] by paptestsrv.pap.state.ga.us - SurfControl E-mail Filter (6.0.1); Fri, 25 Jun 2010 06:06:14 -0400 Subject: Automatic reply Re: Re: [Assp-user] 419 scams From: [email protected] To: "Grayhat" <[email protected]> Message-ID: <of28cfb679.95f8e64f-on8525774d.00377bdc-8525774d.00377...@localdomain> Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 06:06:01 -0400 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on SMTP/pap(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 06/25/2010 06:06:14 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SEF-7853D99-ADF1-478E-8894-213D316B8FFA: 1 X-SEF-Processed: 6_0_1_111__2010_06_25_06_06_26 X-GMX-Antivirus: 0 (no virus found) X-GMX-Antispam: 0 (Mail was not recognized as spam); Detail=5D7Q89H36p5A2q/zrf8nC1auqSWe65tQ0lBHzEgMjVOV7KzbAvaLsnjkghpRkebY+ 5jvT XoZ/1uN4790SOUV3R2oPwyYfZE45XsxdsTj+D5f8nuL13o3e2HKKtyikI+ZVSVqQRiZL6mvO mXlj rTxJQ==V1; X-GMX-UID: MvRBPP5DZCEWrt0y4mwhke1wIGhpZQZa You have sent an e-mail to "For Users of ASSP" <[email protected]> The e-mail received includes an address to an employee who no longer works with Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles. Please make a note of it and discontinue sending messages to this address. DO NOT REPLY. THIS IS AN AUTOMATIC RESPONSE. Original Message below : > Hello, > ASSP is good, ASSP is great. Because of ASSP the nearly 98% of mail we > receive that is spam is blocked. (98%. That is just wrong.) > Except for the "419" scams. > What is it about those types of messages the ASSP cannot get any > traction to reject them? Strange, I don't get any 419 through ASSP; I suspect it may just be a matter of properly setting up some of the ASSP filters including the DNSBL/URIBL and the bayes one and btw using some additional clamav signatures like the ones from sanesecurity ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
