On 8/31/2010 4:05 AM, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 2010-08-31 5:20 AM, Fritz Borgstedt<[email protected]> wrote: >> For Users of ASSP<[email protected]> schreibt: >>> Does this mean my recipient validation needs to be adjusted - this >>> ldaplist.notfound is now 14k in size, while my ldaplist only has the >>> dozen entries appropriate for my domain? >> No, it means, that ASSP is trying to reduce the load by caching the >> misses in recipient validation. > Maybe those type files would be better named something more generic and > more descriptive, like: > > mapname-neg.cache > > Then of course you could have > > mapname-pos.cache > Found and notfound are clear enough - I just needed to confirm that the size of the notfound file was appropriate.
What might be helpful would be to add a note to ldapnotfounddb, something like, "If LDAP is used for recipient validation, this file may contain a relatively large number of invalid addresses." Curiously, I also noticed my ldapnotfounddb is set to the default value (because I never changed it) of "ldapnotfound". However, the file on my hard drive is "ldaplist.notfound". Using version 1.7.5.7(1.0.07) via auto-update. -- Daniel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
