>Is there any inherent problem in sharing the
databases between these two different versions?
This will not work for several tables, because both versions are storing
different records (content) for the same set.
V1 does not know 'mysqlSlaveMode' .
>2) Will there be some problem with rebuildspamdb running on both
systems since they both have different sets of spam mail?
In every case, the rebuild should only run on one system. Share the
folders or rsync the folders from slave to master.
Both versions are using different mechanism to build the spamdb (+HMMdb
V2) and to build the word lists for testing a mail. So the Bayesian check
will run well on the system that has done the rebuild. The other one will
have no detection or much much more less.
It may work better, if you castrate V2 by disabling unicode and disabling
ASSP_WordStem.pm
Also sharing the configuration between both versions will cause havy
problems, because several features uses different file formats/content
and/or configuration parameter names.
V1 and V2 are too different to run them against the same database and
configuration set - so - YES you'll get havy problem, if you doing it.
Thomas
Von: Lee Howard <fax...@howardsilvan.com>
An: For Users of ASSP <assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Datum: 06.02.2014 03:34
Betreff: Re: [Assp-user] multi-head ASSP shared databases
On 01/16/2014 01:34 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> For Users of ASSP <assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net> schreibt:
>> Would someone kindly confirm that this dual-head ASSP server both
>> using
>> a shared database is a supported configuration?
>
> Look into the GUI, section File Paths
So, I believe that I have successfully gotten the various databases into
a shared MySQL database.
I have a couple questions...
1) One server is currently running ASSP 1.9.9(13298), and the other is
running ASSP 2.3.3(14029). Is there any inherent problem in sharing the
databases between these two different versions?
2) Will there be some problem with rebuildspamdb running on both
systems since they both have different sets of spam mail?
The two mail servers are intended to be equal-priority MX servers -
fail-over for each other - providing services in a round-robin
load-balanced sort of way. I would like them to work together instead
of fighting against each other.
Thanks,
Lee.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the Whitepaper.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
DISCLAIMER:
*******************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally
privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the
individual to whom it is addressed.
This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
known virus in this email!
*******************************************************
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the Whitepaper.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
