Ok. So I found this in the log for today as an example. Previously I would see a listing similar to [DNSBL] and then the RBL it was listed on. This looks like the attempt is made but never has anything returned. I did verify that the IP is listed on at least 3 RBL's but according to this it comes back clean? Now letters A,B,C,D,E, and F are local DNS servers we have specified in ASSP. Letter X is the IP that should have come back with a positive listing on a RBL but it looks like it fails to do so. So thinking through this, should I update to the latest ASSP and see if the DNSRBL starts working again? Or is there something I am missing here?
Apr-21-16 16:02:20 [Worker_2] Warning: can't find a name server registration for the sender domain 'something.com' - all DNS queries will be skipped! Apr-21-16 16:02:21 [Worker_2] Sending DNS(A)-query to AA.AA.AA.AA[:53] on cbl.abuseat.org for RBL checks on XX.XX.XX.XXX Apr-21-16 16:02:21 [Worker_2] Sending DNS(A)-query to BB.BB.BB.BB[:53] on zen.spamhaus.org for RBL checks on XX.XX.XX.XXX Apr-21-16 16:02:21 [Worker_2] Sending DNS(A)-query to DD.DD.DD.DD[:53] on bl.spamcop.net for RBL checks on XX.XX.XX.XXX Apr-21-16 16:02:21 [Worker_2] Sending DNS(A)-query to EE.EE.EE.EE[:53] on psbl.surriel.com for RBL checks on XX.XX.XX.XXX Apr-21-16 16:02:21 [Worker_2] Sending DNS(A)-query to CC.CC.CC.CC[:53] on ix.dnsbl.manitu.net for RBL checks on XX.XX.XX.XXX Apr-21-16 16:02:21 [Worker_2] Sending DNS(A)-query to FF.FF.FF.FF[:53] on safe.dnsbl.sorbs.net for RBL checks on XX.XX.XX.XXX Apr-21-16 16:02:21 [Worker_2] Sending DNS(A)-query to AA.AA.AA.AA[:53] on spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net for RBL checks on XX.XX.XX.XXX Apr-21-16 16:02:21 [Worker_2] Sending DNS(A)-query to BB.BB.BB.BB[:53] on dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net for RBL checks on XX.XX.XX.XXX Apr-21-16 16:02:21 [Worker_2] Sending DNS(A)-query to DD.DD.DD.DD[:53] on dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net for RBL checks on XX.XX.XX.XXX Apr-21-16 16:02:21 [Worker_2] Sending DNS(A)-query to EE.EE.EE.EE[:53] on dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net for RBL checks on XX.XX.XX.XXX Apr-21-16 16:02:21 [Worker_2] Sending DNS(A)-query to CC.CC.CC.CC[:53] on db.wpbl.info for RBL checks on XX.XX.XX.XXX Apr-21-16 16:02:21 [Worker_2] Sending DNS(A)-query to FF.FF.FF.FF[:53] on virbl.dnsbl.bit.nl for RBL checks on XX.XX.XX.XXX Apr-21-16 16:02:21 [Worker_2] Commencing RBL checks on 'XX.XX.XX.XXX' Apr-21-16 16:02:21 [Worker_2] Got 7 answers, 7 replies and 0 hits after 0 seconds for RBL checks on 'XX.XX.XX.XXX' Apr-21-16 16:02:21 [Worker_2] Got OK replies from (cbl.abuseat.org zen.spamhaus.org spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net ix.dnsbl.manitu.net db.wpbl.info bl.spamcop.net) - NOTOK replies from () for RBL on 'XX.XX.XX.XXX' Apr-21-16 16:02:21 [Worker_2] Completed RBL checks on 'XX.XX.XX.XXX' The email still got rejected because it was determined as spam, but never has any mention in the block report that it is listed on a RBL. On 4/21/2016 4:11 PM, Jay wrote: > Good day everyone. > > I have a question on the DNSBL in ASSP. So back on 3/26/2016 I updated > our version of Perl from ActiveState(5.16.3) 32bit to Strawberry(5.20.3) > 64bit Perl. We are still running ASSP version 2.4.5(15272). Our > configuration is the same and all our Perl modules are up to date as > well, but for some reason looking through my maillog.txt file I don't > see any detections for [DNSBL] like I used to before the upgrade.I > checked to make sure that all the modules loaded properly and they did. > The moduleLoadErrors.txt lists "There were no module load errors > detected". I also verified that all our testmodes are off and they are. > Anyone else run into a situation like this? Looking at all my logs prior > to the update I see listings for DNSBL, but not after. Weird. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager > Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of > your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and > reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial! > https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z > _______________________________________________ > Assp-user mailing list > Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user > > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2016.0.7539 / Virus Database: 4556/12074 - Release Date: 04/21/16 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
