Yes, of course.
strictSPFRe only tells assp to be *strict* and fail even Softfail/Neutral
spf responses (which is the case). In order to block them add domains also
to blockstrictSPFRe.

Regards,
aqx

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Andy Knuts <a...@knuts.be> wrote:

> I need to add gmail to blockstrictSPFRe, isn't it?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Andy Knuts [mailto:a...@knuts.be]
> To:
> For Users of ASSP [mailto:assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net]
> Sent: Wed, 03 Aug
> 2016 09:28:44 +0100
> Subject: Re: [Assp-user]        Whitelistdb + Spam from gmail
> addresses?
>
>
> > I'm still having this issue while gmail.com is in StrictSPFRe.
> > Example:
> >
> > Aug-03-16 08:10:59 m1-04659-09264 [Worker_2] 104.129.245.78
> > <my.n...@gmail.com> to: my.n...@mydomain.com DKIM-Signature found
> > Aug-03-16 08:10:59 m1-04659-09264 [Worker_2] 104.129.245.78
> > <my.n...@gmail.com> to: my.n...@mydomain.com info: domain gmail.com has
> > published a DMARC record
> > Aug-03-16 08:10:59 m1-04659-09264 [Worker_2] 104.129.245.78
> > <my.n...@gmail.com> to: my.n...@mydomain.com strictspf Regex:
> strictSPFRe
> > '@gmail.com'
> > Aug-03-16 08:10:59 m1-04659-09264 [Worker_2] 104.129.245.78
> > <my.n...@gmail.com> to: my.n...@mydomain.com [scoring] SPF: softfail
> (cache)
> > ip=104.129.245.78 mailfrom=my.n...@gmail.com helo=emilyskye.me
> > Aug-03-16 08:10:59 m1-04659-09264 [Worker_2] 104.129.245.78
> > <my.n...@gmail.com> to: my.n...@mydomain.com Message-Score: added 21
> > (spfValencePB) for SPF softfail, total score for this message is now 21
> > Aug-03-16 08:11:00 m1-04659-09264 [Worker_2] [MessageOK] 104.129.245.78
> > <my.n...@gmail.com> to: my.n...@mydomain.com message ok - (whitelistdb)
> -
> > [RE Still chained to your day job] ->
> > /var/db/assp/notspam/RE_Still_chained_to_your_day_job--21377.eml
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Andy Knuts [mailto:a...@knuts.be]
> > To:
> > assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Sent: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 10:53:52
> > +0100
> > Subject: [Assp-user] Whitelistdb + Spam from gmail addresses?
> >
> >
> > > I have a gmail account myu...@gmail.com and my email address
> protected by
> > > ASSP is myuser@mydomain. I have sent emails from myuser@mydomain to
> > > myu...@gmail.com so it got whitelisted by ASSP. Now, there are
> spammers
> > > sending spam faking it to come from myu...@gmail.com to
> myuser@mydomain.
> > > It's clearly spam but it gets through because ASSP whitelisted the
> email
> > > address myu...@gmail.com.
> > >
> > > How can I prevent this?
> > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and
> > traffic
> > > patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and
> protocols
> > are
> > >
> > > consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for
> NetFlow,
> > > J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity
> > > planning
> > > reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Assp-user mailing list
> > > Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
> > >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > _______________________________________________
> > Assp-user mailing list
> > Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-user mailing list
> Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
>



-- 
"Madness, like small fish, runs in hosts, in vast numbers of instances."

Nessuno mi pettina bene come il vento.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user

Reply via email to