All DNSBL results are cached for the period defined in RBLCacheExp.

DNSBL/RBL is skipped for:

- acceptAll Mail
- outgoing mail
- contentOnly
- noprocessing (IP and adresses) (by size is ignored)
- RWL trusted
- whitelisted if RBLWL is not set
- noRBL
- IP in white PenalyBox
- RBL spam lovers
- all spam lovers

check DKIMWLAddresses and DKIMNPAddresses

There is a hidden config parameter to control the DKIM pass action.

$DKIMpassAction = 7;                 # (0..7) if DKIM pass: bit-0 = set 
rwlok to 1 (medium trust status), bit-1 = skip penaltybox-check, bit-2 = 
set IP-score to zero - default is 7 (all bits set)

To change this - edit the assp.pl (line 442 in build 19007) or - better 
set (add the line)

$main::DKIMpassAction = 0;  # to 0....7 - what ever you want

in 'sub set' of lib/CorrectASSPcfg.pm

Thomas



Von:    "Phil Quesinberry" <pques...@qsystemsengineering.com>
An:     "'For Users of ASSP'" <assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Datum:  04.06.2019 18:43
Betreff:        [Assp-user] RBL checks not always being done



My messages don’t seem to be making it to the list so I’m trying again 
after refreshing my list settings.  My apologies if this is a duplicate.
We’re noticing some emails which are pretty obviously spam and are listed 
on DNSBLs like Spamhaus Zen but are making it through anyway.  Looking at 
the log, RBL checks are not being done on these emails.  We’re using a 
local caching recursive DNS resolver (unbound) and it’s working fine, but 
what seems to be happening is the messages pass some sort of check like 
DKIM or SPF, and then they seem to get the all clear without doing the RBL 
checks.  If they fail the DKIM check or there’s something else that scores 
against them, then DNSBL/URIBL checks are done.  So it seems that all a 
spammer really has to do is properly sign their spam emails coming from 
wespamyou.com and the Jedi mind trick is complete.  “There’s no spam to 
see here, move along.”
I’m not seeing any settings relevant to this that would seem to change 
this behavior, is there something I’m missing?  Also, on a semi-related 
note, is there a setting that allows you to cache DNSBL misses like 
URIBLCacheIntervalMiss does for URIBLs, or does that setting also apply to 
DNSBLs as well?  Being able to cache misses for just 5 or 10 minutes could 
significantly reduce query traffic for sites with lots of mail traffic 
without a huge or lasting impact on accuracy.
Thanks!
Phil Quesinberry
Q Systems Engineering, Inc.
Embedded Systems, Telecom, IT
(410) 969-8002  Ext.102
http://www.qsystemsengineering.com


Virus-free. www.avast.com 
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user




DISCLAIMER:
*******************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally 
privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the 

individual to whom it is addressed.
This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no 
known virus in this email!
*******************************************************


_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user

Reply via email to