On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Cedric Blancher <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10 January 2013 23:07, Cedric Blancher > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 3 December 2012 11:14, Cedric Blancher >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 20 October 2012 19:57, Cedric Blancher >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Glenn, can you put msggen into the next ast-ksh alpha, please? >>> >>> xmas wish: Glenn, can you put msggen into the next ast-ksh alpha, please? >> >> Glenn, was this wish granted (can't check, the next alpha/beta isn't out >> yet)? > > Sorry to beat this dead horse, but can you move msggen to ast-ksh, > please? It seems a critical bug in $"l10n literal" support crept in > because testing this requires msggen and since it isn't in ast-ksh the > $"literals" were not tested in the last couple of alphas. > > Ced
What again was Glenn's reason for rejecting the move? As far as I can see we need both pty and msggen utilities for the ksh93 test suite. Irek _______________________________________________ ast-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
