On 12 June 2013 19:06, Cedric Blancher <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10 June 2013 13:40, Lionel Cons <[email protected]> wrote: >> Is anyone here interested in SIGPOLL support in ksh93 (after the >> .sh.sig support has been fixed), i.e. provide a way to open a fd with >> O_ASYNC and listen to the SIGIO or SIGPOLL signals. > > I assume you know about the poll(1) builtin ksh93 now supports.
Yes, sure. We use poll almost everywhere now > > What's the purpose of SIGPOLL support? Trying to implement push > notification for socket I/O instead of pull via poll(1)? Yes, albeit its useless to discuss or even try to implement until signals work reliably and the traps are called in the order the signals arrived. Lionel _______________________________________________ ast-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
