On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 09:48:43AM +0200, Irek Szczesniak wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Isaac <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm attempting to build ast-base for the sake of ksh93 on a new Linux libc, > > musl[1]; I am using musl 0.9.11. > > The attempt was made on a minimal system with musl as the native libc, > > but it's quite simple to install it in parallel with libc6 and use > > the musl-gcc wrapper as CC (see option 1 in [2] for details). > > > > I grabbed the latest releases today from the main download page > > for INIT and ast-base. > > > > After extracting in ~/ast/, I typed this: > > bin/package make CFLAGS="-D_ALL_SOURCE -Os" 2>&1 |tee ast-pkg-make.log > > > > The attempt to compile appears to stop pretty quick; I'm attaching the > > build log (bz2 compressed since it's nearly 19 megabytes, for some reason.) > > > > I notice that a great number of iffe tests are giving false negatives; > > I don't know why this is. <snip> > > > > Any ideas what's wrong? > > I'm looking, but you'll have more luck with our resident standard > experts Glenn Fowler, David Korn or Roland Mainz. Glenn (who owns > libast and iffe) is unfortunately on vacation for the next two weeks, > maybe David or Roland can have a look. > > Which compiler do you use - gcc or clang?
GCC 3.4.6 in this case (for compilation speed and lower ram use), with 4.1 to 4.4 available. Thanks, Isaac Dunham _______________________________________________ ast-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
