cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ast-developers] .sh.sig.value without typeset -C? --------
> May be just an oversight: Why doesn't .sh.sig.value the compound > attribute, i.e. typeset -C? And related, how can there ever be a > compound variable without the -C attribute? > This is an oversite. .sh.sig and .sh.stats use a different method which is more efficient since it knows the complete list of sub-variables. The -C attributes only shows up when it uses the standard method for compound variables. David Korn [email protected] _______________________________________________ ast-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
