On 29 August 2013 22:11, Glenn Fowler <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 22:02:21 +0200 Roland Mainz wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Glenn Fowler <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > the AT&T Software Technology ast alpha 2013-08-29 source release >> > has been posted to the download site >> > http://www.research.att.com/sw/download/alpha/ >> > the package names and md5 checksums are >> > INIT 132e0403af573fa1cb1e202267fedeb8 >> > ast-open 334615fb3a652575106194c281d27b5c >> > ast-ksh ebcc56d9ab673aaafbb163d6eee1a93c >> > the md5 sums should match the ones listed on the download page > > when using non-default options please qualify "doesn't build" > (even though you provided the cc line which hints at it) > in this case I believe its > "... doesn't build using PACKAGE_OPTIONS=map-libc ..." > which means this or something equivalent > bin/package make PACKAGE_OPTIONS=map-libc
Wait. Isn't PACKAGE_OPTIONS=map-libc enabled by default when no other options are given? It doesn't make sense to build without it, at least on Linux. Ced -- Cedric Blancher <[email protected]> Institute Pasteur _______________________________________________ ast-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
