On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 04:02:24 +0200 Cedric Blancher wrote: > On 30 August 2013 03:59, Glenn Fowler <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 01:15:30 +0200 Roland Mainz wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Glenn Fowler <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > the AT&T Software Technology ast alpha 2013-08-29 source release > >> > has been posted to the download site > >> > http://www.research.att.com/sw/download/alpha/ > >> > the package names and md5 checksums are > >> > INIT 132e0403af573fa1cb1e202267fedeb8 > >> > ast-open 334615fb3a652575106194c281d27b5c > >> > ast-ksh ebcc56d9ab673aaafbb163d6eee1a93c > >> > the md5 sums should match the ones listed on the download page > > > > well that RELEASE note was optimistic > > > > I had it and ls.c over there before I realized that ast ls has not been > > fts-ized yet > > it uses the ancient ast pre-fts ftwalk() api
> 1. We are in alpha mode, right? > 2. Since we are in 1., could you not just add it *NOW* and let the > crazy audience which dares enough to use builtin ls; ls -l take their > chances? :) there's more work involved than fts-izing and there is nothing worse than a busted ls if a builtin ls screws up it takes the shell with it so no quick fix here _______________________________________________ ast-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
