On 30 August 2013 21:05, ольга крыжановская <[email protected]> wrote: > IMO before you move ksh93v- to "beta" status, we should collect bugs > and changes which should be done and finalized before we call it beta. > There are very, very bad issues in ast-ksh.20130829, and they should > be addressed. I am going - due lack of Bugzilla, a list on our svn. > > Submissions for the worst of worst bugs please to the list now.
ksh -c 'typeset -s -E x=4 ; print $(( x=nextafter(x,5) ))' should use C nextafterf(), ksh -c 'typeset -E x=4 ; print $(( x=nextafter(x,5) ))' should use C nextafter() and ksh -c 'typeset -l -E x=4 ; print $(( x=nextafter(x,5) ))' should use C nextafterl(). ksh arithmetic nexttoward() should call C nexttowardf(), C nexttoward() or nexttowardl() depending on the right ksh floating point type, like in the example above. Tina -- Tina Harriott - Women in Mathematics Contact: [email protected] _______________________________________________ ast-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
