On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Glenn Fowler <[email protected]> wrote: > > we will most likely handle "restrict" in a similar way to "const" > to keep the code readable > where > all ast code will use "restrict" > #ifdef magic in ast_common.h will do one of the following > possibly augmented by probe info when nmake is used to build: > (1) nothing -- "restrict" or its expansion will be seen by the > compiler > (2) #define restrict __restrict > (3) #define restrict > with (3) being the fallback position
Ok... ... can we do this for the next alpha, please (technically... without consumers... it should not harm anything (currently) ... right ?) ? ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) [email protected] \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 3992797 (;O/ \/ \O;) _______________________________________________ ast-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
